1.
Project Description
Location: |
Essen,
Germany |
Client: |
Hochtief
AG |
Occupier: |
RWE
AG |
Date
of Construction: |
1994-1996 |
Architect: |
Ingenhoven,
Overdieck, Kahlen & Partner |
Collaborators: |
Achim
Nagel, Klaus Frankenheim, Martin Slawic, Claudia de Bruyn, Regina
Wuff |
Building
type:
|
Office building
- administrative headquarters for the electric company |
Building
Envelope:
|
Josef
Gartner and Co. |
No.
of stories:
|
31 |
Gross Area:
|
35,000m2 |
Construction
Cost:
|
£90
million |
Climate Zone:
|
Temperate |
Approx.
Percentage of Gross Floor Naturally Ventilated:
|
70% |
Approx.
Percentage of Net Floor Area Needing Artificial Lighting During
Daylight Hours:
|
30% |
Fuel/Approx.
% Use:
|
Mains
electricity 99%; photovoltaics 1% |
top>>
2.
Photo Gallery
top>>
3. Design Concept
3.1
Site Context
As is widely known, in Europe any new building is
required to blend in with the other buildings in a street.
The RWE Tower has the main building set back from the street, along with
the pergola the height of which is aligned with the eaves of neighbouring
houses. There was still need to obtain the special sanction of the
municipal authorities to construct the skyscraper. As Achim Nagel, one of
the IOK architects, explained, churches dating back to ancient times were
the only tall buildings. The 162m height of the tower, including an aerial
on the top, is the highest point in North-Rhine Westphalia, but does not
look isolated, when it is seen from anywhere in the city. Its abstract and
clear external appearance is essentially in harmony with the row of stores
and houses in the street.
top>>
3.2
Building Form
When compared to other prismatic
forms, the cylindrical shape is ideal in terms of the relationship between
exterior surface and interior volume. It also optimizes aerodynamics,
energy needs, surface distribution, and choice of prefabricated elements.
With the cylindrical shape, air
speeds are twice the wind pressure, which eases vertical circulation of
airflow and the diagonal ventilation in all stories.
top>>
3.3
Interior Space
The architects chose to separate
the vertical communication cores and group them into a svelte, attached
column. This simplified the distribution of offices, making the most of
the interior space. The office levels are configured around a nucleus;
they subdivide into conference rooms, round hallways, and peripheral bands
of offices and stairs that interconnect some of the levels. The outer
glass skin allows natural light to reach the internal core.
Each floor has a theme:
- Entrance Hall with Sense of Space
The elevator shafts are housed in a tower, detached
from the main tower, so the ground floor has ample open space to share a
continuity with the theater and the city park. On this level, the
columns are a significant factor in the design, to indicate that the
building is supported by them, whereas a sense of space is available at
the same time. As with the columns, the walls are rough concrete, and
the surface is coated with water paint for protection.
- The Basement Open to the Garden
The first basement (actually half-underground) with a
total surface area of 600sqm has a staff restaurant and dining rooms,
the facade of which is glazed from floor to ceiling, since the view of
the garden in the site is regarded as important for relaxation. The
glass of the facade was formed from the development of a truncated cone.
Every part of it has a different size and shape. The staff restaurant
has three glazed doors for access to the garden over the lake.
Nature-oriented Office Rooms - The 2nd-18th and 20-24th floors are for
office rooms. Due to the relatively small cylindrical plan of 32m in
diameter, every office room faces the exterior, so as to admit the outer
light directly and enjoy the panoramic view.
Four ordinary elevator shafts are installed in an
independent tower built along side of the main building. Owing to their
outside location, people can easily find where they are.
- Sunny Boardroom on the Top Floor
On the top floor, the 29th floor of the RWE Tower, there
is a boardroom for gatherings of the RWE Group executives from around
the world. The ceiling of the boardroom is fitted with a large toplight,
and the sunlight from it is regulated by an electric curtain. Not only
its facade, but also its partition panels are mostly made of glass,
so as to enhance to view of the surrounding area.
top>>
3.4 Double Skin
The main concern of the design of
this 31-storey cylindrical tower is natural ventilation. This is achieved
by its double-leaf facade, which is intended to provide good natural
ventilation for perimeter office areas. The space inside the facade is
supplied with outside air through a meandering arrangement of intake and
exhaust louvres.
The double skin allows the RWE
Tower to "breathe". It consists of an exterior sheet made of
fixed glass panels - 2 x 3.6m modules that permit air circulation through
corresponding slots, and an interior sheet with operable panels. A solar
protection system is installed between both layers, which are 50cm apart.
Strips, placed on the setting lines for the exterior facade modules, are
perforated on the right side and solid on the left side, at the lower
level. The disposition is reversed on the upper level, next to the roof,
which guarantees a minimum diagonal of ventilation and prevents the return
of recently evacuated air back into the spaces. The interior layer of
the double skin is a conventional facade, insulated by collapsible panels
that can be controlled manually.
- Sun shading & thermal
storage
When the solar radiation is strong, the temperature
inside the double-skin rises as in a greenhouse. However, owing to the air
inlets and outlets fitted to the top and bottom of each story, the air
convects so as to take the heat away. An experiment using a life-size
model proved that the hotter the facade became relative to the surrounding
air, the more remarkable the convection effect that was achieved, so as to
carry out the sunshading function. Of course, the thermal storage effect
becomes vital, when there is a need to warm the room as in the winter
season.
The double skin allows natural
ventilation in the tower. Even the upper workspaces can enjoy natural air
control without having to fight wind gusts. Users can control their own
environment.
The natural ventilation in a high-rise could give rise
to the following fears: a very force power might be required to open the
room doors; the wind might stream from the room to the corridor, blowing
papers about; the wind might also make disturbing noises. Actually, natural ventilation may be restricted or influenced by such constructional
parameters as:
- facade layout,
- ventilation slits or louvres,
- air-tightness of windows and doors,
- design of doors (revolving doors, opening and closing mechanisms).
After the investigation of
these condition for cross-ventilation during the design stage (which
will be discussed in section 4), the mentioned problems have been
solved by the design specific. Namely, the power required to open the
doors is some 20% less than that in a 7-8 story building with a
conventional facade; the wind entering is regulated, so as not to blow
papers about; the air inlets and outlets are designed not to make noise.
During some 70% of the year, it is possible to live in the high-rise
with the controlled natural ventilation, without artificial cooling or
heating. Of course, as the inner facade can be freely opened up to 15cm,
the individuals in the office rooms can let in the wind to satisfy their
own requirements. Of course a system of mechanical ventilation is also
installed, but it is operated at most twice an hour, whereas there is a
need to ventilate 4-6 times hourly and to spend a lot of energy to cool
or heat the air in more conventional buildings. By harnessing the
natural ventilation, one can avoid sick-building syndrome which one is
apt to get in full air-conditioned multi-story buildings.
When the weather is forbidding,
temperature is managed by an air-conditioning system with a minimum
capacity of air recycling.
top>>
3.5
"Fish-mouth"
The diagonial streaming of air
facade_detail.jpg
228Kb |
The parts that support the outer facade
as well as absorb or exhaust air are called "fish-mouths"
by the architects, which are responsible for both the intake and
outtake of air in the double-skin.
This is a pair of sashes, where one carries a
"fish-mouth" with small holes on its upper part
exclusively for intake, and another has a "fish- mouth"
with small holes on its lower part exclusively for outtake, as
indicated in the plan. Due to such a composition, the outside air
from the intake "fish-mouth" is warmed inside the
double-skin and diagonally ascends to be exhausted from the outtake
"fish-mouth" at the neighboring sash. If both the
"fish-mouths" had been laid out vertically, exhaust air
would take the shortest path up to the floor above and enter it in
the place of fresh environmental air. If this happened, air quality
would decrease with every subsequent floor.
Because of the stack effect in stairwells and the
elevator shafts, special attention was paid to where certain air
locks and vents should be placed throughout the building. Through
extensive wind tunnel and computer modeling, a design consensus was
reached. When absorbed, the air stream is adjusted to a suitable
speed, by going through the "fish-mouth." It is made
slower in case the wind velocity is too great, whereas it is made
faster in case their is no enough wind. Of course, no rain enters
through the "fish-mouth." The sensors fitted to the
aperture inform of the aerial conditions.
As mentioned above, the "fish-mouth" can
also be used by raising its cover as a footplate for cleaning, and
is effective in preventing fire from spreading to upper or lower
levels. Also, its gently curved bottom side is formed to reflect
sunlight moderately and to take in solar energy to the maximum
extent. Incidentally, because the air conditions, including the wind
velocity, vary according to the altitude, there is a difference in
size between the "fish-mouths" above the 16th floor and
those below it.
As a matter of course, exhaustive studies were
performed until the form of the "fish-mouth" was finally
determined. |
top>>
3.6
Environmental Controls
Environmental conditions are managed
by Building Management Systems (BMS) technology, with a single control
panel in every room enabling light, temperature, facade and sun protection
to be adjusted to individual requirements. Integrated ceiling elements
set into the concrete soffits are also multifunctional, incorporating
low-energy lighting and a water-flushed pipework system for cooling, as
well as smoke alarms and sprinkler systems.
top>>
4. Studies of
Natural Ventilation
4.1 Wind
Condition
wind statistic for essen.jpg
147Kb |
Wind
velocities are measured at the local weather station. Winds are
predominantly from the south, the south west, and the west, with a
mean wind velocity (from KIN 4710) of 4.0m/s.
Due to the difference in
height, wind profiles near the skyscraper & the meteorological
conditions at several levels were further investigated.
- At height 110m: wind
velocities exceed by approximately 20%
- At height 60m: wind
velocities exceed by approximately 5% (used as data for
simulation of the cross-ventilation)
|
top>>
4.2
Building Aerodynamics
qualitative pressure
distribution.jpg 52Kb |
Wind pressure coefficients were
determined in a wind tunnel study for the stimulation. The qualitative
course of pressure distribution on the cylindrical exterior from 4
directions was recorded in the figure on the left.
The result of the wind tunnel test
showed a marked pressure differences (+1.0 to -2.3), which would lead to
an intensive cross-ventilation.
|
top>>
4.3
Facades
facade structure.jpg
52 Kb |
The
double skin facade is intended to maintain floor by floor separation
with the help of horizontally arranged dividers. To prevent
exhaust-air influx into the lower floors, the exhaust louvre is
diagonal in relation to the intake louvre.
With regard to the lateral
dividers, the following variations were studied:
Vertical dividers in the
facade seal the individual axes from one another and dampen the
sound carried within the facade cavity, in effect creating a box
window. (see facade structure.jpg)
- perimeter double-leaf
facade with two sectors
When a vertical divider is
not used, the facade is only divided into separate sectors (NE and
SW skin) by the two elevator shafts. Within these two sectors, the
air taken in through the facade can flow in the direction of the
perimeter of the building. (see section.jpg)
|
section.
jpg 65Kb
|
top>>
4.4
Reduction of Wind Pressures
typical pressure distribution.jpg
98Kb |
Without
vertical dividers, the wind pressure can be partially reduced
through free air movement in the direction of the building
circumference in t he double facade cavity. The pressures inside the
perimeter facade are essentially defined by the relation of the flow
resistances for the ventilation louvres and by the facade
cross-ventilation.
From the resulting figures,
it is clear that the wind pressure differences acting in the cavity
can be reduced by 50% during easterly wind in comparison with
results given for the box window variation.
|
top>>
4.5
Natural Cross-Ventilation
Air change.jpg
133Kb |
The final
simulation reproduces natural cross-ventilation, based on the
pressure coefficients resulting from the wind-tunnel test. To
simulate Cross-ventilation, observations were made of the following
opening situations for easterly wind at an average velocity of 4m/s:
- in each office: one open
sliding window
- in two windward offices
(opening to the NE facade) and in one office located at the
negative pressure peak (on the NE envelope): one sliding window
each
- in one windward office
(facing the NE facade): one sliding window: in the negative
pressure area (facing the SW facade) three offices have opened
windows
The result of comparing the
air-change behaviour in the opening situations under observation for
the perimeter facade (double-leaf) and the box window variation is
recorded in the figure on the left. (The numbers on the diagrams
represent hourly air-change rates due to natural cross-ventilation).
(Refer to the diagram on
the left, 1st column, top) When all sliding windows are opened,
the air-change rate decreases proportionately. Offices near the
dynamic pressure and at the negative pressure peak are most
strongly cross-ventilated, while offices at the SW envelope are
less strongly cross-ventilated.
(1st column, middle) When
sliding windows are opened in windward offices and in the office
at the negative pressure peak (middle figure), the air-change
rates are predictably high, since these are the areas where the
maximum wind pressure differential has its greatest impact.
(1st column, bottom) The
peak value is lower, since the pressure difference between the
maximum at the NE envelope and the negative pressure area in the
SW envelope is not as defined as in the windward tract.
- Perimeter Double-Leaf
Facade
(2nd column, top) In
contrast to the box-type windows, when windows are opened on all
sides in this configuration, the air-change rates are higher in
both building envelopes since the intake and exit air
respectively, of an office can enter/leave through several louvres
whereas, for box-type windows, this is possible only through the
opening louvre within the grid line, because of the divider.
(2nd column, middle) When
only some sliding windows are opened to the inner facade, the
air-change rates are higher than observed for all-round opened
sliding windows, since the outer air can flow more strongly across
all air louvres of a facade segment towards the windows.
(2nd column, bottom) When
office windows are opened in opposite envelopes, the room
ventilation is almost double that observed when box windows are
used. The air-change rates are less, despite the opposite
envelopes, because a complete pressure balance is not achieved
inside the NE envelope and high pressure differences remain. The
intensive air exchange between the two sectors can be counteracted
by closing office doors.
|
top>>
4.6
Influence of Window Opening
Occupants can lessen the opened
gap of the sliding door to manipulate the cross-ventilation in the room
and to adjust it to their comfort level. It has been observed that a
reduction of air change is possible when the gap is reduced for both the
perimeter facade with two sectors and for box-type windows. The reduction
is stronger in the former case, because of the pressure balance created by
the facade cavity.
top>>
4.7
Door Opening Forces
door opening.jpg
160Kb |
When office
doors are kept closed, cross-ventilation is very limited. However,
the wind pressures on the outer envelope of the building also affect
the offices, exerting pressure on the office doors and hence
increasing door-opening forces.
The following criteria were
used to evaluate the forces acting upon doors:
- door-opening forces
should not exceed 40N (corresponds to 4kg) for continued
operation
- intermittent door-opening
forces up to 60N are tolerable
- the top limit for
openability is a force of 100N
Furthermore, the evaluation
was based on the assumption that no door closers would be used. When
doors are equipped with closers, the opening forces would be
exponentially increased by the door-closing force, whenever the
operative directions of pressure force and door closers coincide.
Test results for the
box-type window were predictably poor. The flow resistance at the
air slits is similar to that of the office door joints and can
therefore only partially relieve the force acting upon the office
doors.
- Perimeter Double-Leaf
Facade
The resulting peak value
of the door-opening force is only half that established for the
box-type window. The opening situation with two windward side
offices and one office near the negative pressure peak at the NE
envelope clarifies the pressure decrease within one sector of the
perimeter facade. The situation becomes more critical when windows
in offices on both opposite sectors are open. The double-leaf
facade with two perimeter sectors yields better results that does
the box-type window configuration. This can be understood as a
result of the simultaneous effect of the dynamic pressure and the
negative pressure peak on a built envelop, so that the inner
pressures in both envelopes are nearly identical. The remaining
door-opening forces could be even further reduced by closing
individual office doors.
|
top>>
4.8
Operating Restrictions in Natural Ventilation
comfort loss.jpg
63Kb |
Prediction can be
made on how frequently natural ventilation may be restricted because
of increased door-opening forces or draughts in a typical year. In
the 1st scenario, windows and office doors can be opened in the
observed office space and in all other offices; and in the other,
doors and windows can be opened only in the office space observed
and in one other office.
- Door-Opening Forces in
Office Rooms
(referring to the diagram
on the left, top & middle) The result exhibit certain
differences for both variations of facade design, i.e. for the
door-opening forces and for the air-change rates. These
differences, however, are not excessive the thus give a fair
representation of typical values. For box-type windows,
door-opening forces above 60N may occur, in extreme cases, in
Office 6 for approximately 9.5% of the total operating period. for
the perimeter facade, this occurs only approximately 3% of the
time in Office 1. Door-opening forces above 100N should be avoided
completely. All the same, They are likely to occur for box-type
windows, for 3.5% of the total operating period and for the
perimeter facade for only 0.5%. In both cases, the highest values
are to be found on the SW envelope. for the perimeter facade, the
conditions could be improved by closing individual corridor
doors.
- Air-Change Rates in
Offices
The result of the
frequency of air-change rates higher than 25ac/h caused by natural
cross-ventilation is recorded at the bottom of the left diagram.
In general, office
air-change rates are slightly lower for the box-type window
variation than for the perimeter facade scenario. Office
air-change rates above 25/h can occur with thebox-type window for
approximately 50% of the total operating period (58% for perimeter
facade). Air-change rates above 200 are practically impossible in
both scenarios. These observations apply to a standard floor plan
with individual offices. For plan offices, the perimeter facade
yields better results.
|
top>>
4.9
Summer Temperatures Inside the Facade
Air temp.jpg
91Kb |
The
fluctuation of summer temperatures inside the double-leaf facade is
important in relation to window ventilation and the transfer heat
rate of the offices. In the simulation, an automatic shading device
was installed which closes when the solar incidence reaches 250 W/m2.
- Facade Temperature
Development in the Course of a Day
(refer to the 1st diagram
on the left, top) During calms, the temperature conditions in the
box-type window and the perimeter facade are comparable. In the NE
envelope, the temperature peaks at 36oC; in the SW
envelope, at 42oC. Inside the perimeter facade, the
maximum temperatures are somewhat offset in the direction of the
perimeter.
(1st diagram, bottom) It's
a completely different picture for average wind velocities. The
intensive cross-flow on the perimeter facade significantly
decreases temperatures. In the NE envelope, temperatures for both
facade variations peak at 32oC; in the SW envelope,
they range from 36.0 to 39.5oC (box-type window) and
33.5 to 37.5oC (perimeter facade).
|
natural facade ventilation.jpg
76Kb |
- Facade Ventilation
Development in the Course of a Day
(refer to the 2nd diagram
on the left, top) During calms, both variations exhibit almost
identical thermal ventilation, where intake air flows through the
lower slit and exit air through the upper slit.
(2nd diagram, bottom) For
oncoming wind, the outside air, in the case of the perimeter
facade, flows into the building on the windward side the exits the
building on the leeside. The more intensive cross-ventilation for
the perimeter facade has a positive effect on natural ventilation
so that some odour may be transported in the direction of the
perimeter.
|
facade temperature.jpg
52Kb |
- Increased Temperatures in
the Course of a Year
There are noticeable
advantages for the perimeter facade with temperature increased.
(diagram on the left, top)
In the NE section, depending upon orientation, temperatures rise
above 30oC for 3 to 40 hours for box-type windows and 3
to 30 hours for perimeter facades, and temperatures rise above 26oC
for 50 to 150 hours for box-type windows and 50 to 130 hours for
perimeter facades.
(diagram on the left,
bottom) In the SW section, the differences are even more evident.
Temperatures above 30oC can be expected for 10 to 70
hours for box-type windows and 10 to 40 hours for perimeter
facades, and temperatures above 26oC for 85 to 180
hours for box-type windows and 85 to 125 hours for perimeter
facades during the operating period.
|
top>>
5.
References
- The Technology of Ecologi8cal
Building, Basic Principles and Measures, Examples and Ideas, p110-121,
written by Klaus Daniels, published by Birkhauser Verlag, Basel,
Boston, Berlin
- Ecological architecture,
Bioclimatic trends and Landscape Architecture in the Year 2001,
p118-127, edited by Aurora Cuito, published by LOFT publications,
Barcelona, Spain
- Architecture and the
Environment, Bioclimatic Building Design, p216-219, written by David
Lloyd Jones, published by Laurence King Publishing, London
- http://www.nsg.co.jp/spm/sm81~90/sm86_contents/sm86_e_index.html
- http://www.rwe.com/eng/1.8_RWE_Konzern/Turm/Index1.html
- http://naturalvent.mit.edu/Europe/rwe.htm
top>>
|
Case Study Index |
|